She says “Life is small, enjoy it as much as you can, take the decisions and grab the opportunities. Don’t bind yourself in moral and ethical dilemma”.

I say “Life is too big, take decision cautiously, because at the end when you will see the memoir you may regret on the decision and choices. Enjoyment is a perception and morale is an inherent part of it.”

She says, “Let the life be an open book, who cares what we are, why we are and how we are? Why to hide the truth and why to make the boundaries easy to break, better do not make limits”.

I say “Life is of course an open book, and the moment you allow others to ready that open book, you are vulnerable to the comments and compliments that actually matters a lot. You can’t ignore them then. Better make some boundaries (privacy), and remain on the safer side”.

She says “I want a normal life, a good job, an understanding, intelligent and responsible boy friend, then life is secured, and let it flow in the steady phase of life”.

I say, “Job can be a way to get the things done, to find path to channelize the creative energy. But surely it can’t be the aim. A job is an instrument for deed you really want from life, not the life itself. Don't make boy friend because you want him, but let the things move on it own pace you will get one without conditions”.

She says “What matters finally is the destination, it’s the aim not the path that you took to reach that location. Actions matters as they can are seen and remembered by others not the reason behind them”.

I say, “The path that you chose is far more important than the destination itself. For me reasons behind the actions are more important than actions themselves”.

She say “No one is permanent, people come and go, so use them as much as you can. After all we have to travel alone in the walk of life”.

I say, “Of course they come and they go, but our memories stick with our self and they remain in our memories, so make them friends not as commodities of use”.

She says, “There is lack of resources and only those who are fast and selfish will get the best one, so be cunning”.

I say, “There is enough for our need, and if you take the proper way even then you will get sufficient, so there is no need to go for unhealthy way”.

She says that she like me and will change herself once she will get me. I ask her to change herself first, and then she will get me automatically.

She says she is not wrong, it’s just she is different; I agree with her on that and replies that we are not compatible with each other and one of us has to compromise on ideology.

She thinks there is enough space for both of us, I disagree on that. She ask for both of us to compromise equally, I rejected. And its over.

Now I regret, she moved on and so did I. But the time I spent with her is the only colorful chapter of my life. Was break up inevitable? Could not there be a way out? Judge it and tell me what went wrong, and who was responsible? I am in dilemma..

Votes: 0
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of MyEnglishClub to add comments!

Join MyEnglishClub

Comments

  • Your relationship is entangled by the ideologies that you let them reign.  It's no longer the hearts that speak but the minds that clash.

    What more, loving a person is not changing a person to conform to your needs.  

    It is evident that a competition existed between you and your girl.  Each one insisted on being recognized as faultless.  Lower your pride guys and humbly accept each other without changing anyone.

  • Then why do I repent? Why do I feel remorse? Can't 2 different ideologies and perceptions life together? 

  • Maybe you're not meant for each other. It seems both of you are looking at the same thing but with different perspectives and views.  

This reply was deleted.